On 7/6/07, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
>
> Are you not mixing syntax validation (well-formedness) with the more
> specific (ie, DTD) document validation (that blq _may_ have meant)?
>
> Not that DTD validation is always needed/desired, but when it is, the
> choice of xml would seem to be a no-brainer.
That breaks the internet.
Not everything is the Internet.
% lynx -dump http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1122.txt | grep -B1 'nd"$'
"Be liberal in what you accept, and
conservative in what you send"
-john
So this makes you a fan of HTML5 I guess.
BobLQ
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
