Carl Lowenstein wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Lan Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, August 3, 2007 2:38 pm, Carl Lowenstein wrote:
>>> On 8/3/07, Carl Lowenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> So I booted the Fedora 7 Live CD, and tried to find out what software
>>>> packages were installed.
>>>>
>>> There may be light at the end of the tunnel.  The corresponding Live
>>> CD from Rawhide, which says "Fedora 8" on a splash screen, but "Fedora
>>> release 7.90" when asked politely, still seems to have no .rpm files
>>> but at least "rpm -qa" works the way it should.
> 
> Some second thought here.  There are no .rpm packages because this is
> a Live CD, and you aren't supposed to add to what is already
> installed.  I can live with that, but it was somewhat disconcerting
> when the list of installed packages could not be generated.

I was just in the process of asking you what you expected to find.

I guess the install from livecd probably duplicates itself on its victim?

If so, you can see the list of rpms comprising the livecd via
 rpm -qa

Is that not what you are looking to find out?

>
>>> Maybe there are updates/bug fixes on repository sites, but I haven't
>>> gone looking for them because I don't yet have a real Fedora 7
>>> installation to work with.
>>>
>> As a veteran of many RH releases, I have two pieces of hard-won wisdom to
>> share:
>>
>> 1. Never be the first on your block
>>
>> 2. Occasionally just skip one
> 
> At the moment, I have skipped 4, 5, and 6, since I am still running
> Fedora Core 3 on my main machine.  I think it's time for a change.
> Core 6 on the Thinkpad laptop seems OK, although I don't use it for
> much besides bringing to InstallFests to have a known working computer
> among all the others that turn up there.

I installed f7 a couple days ago on my x86_64, and am happy with it.
Also played with the livecd a bit, and it seems pretty nice, too.

One major promise that I think they came out good on was making wireless
 'just work' -- I don't know yet whether they actually got close to
_that_, but it sure does *suck much less*. :-)

Regards,
..jim


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to