Lan Barnes wrote: > On Sun, August 19, 2007 3:06 pm, Andrew Lentvorski wrote: >> Lan Barnes wrote: >>> I think what we're witnessing is svn's living up to its charter, to "be >>> a >>> compelling replacement for cvs." >> I agree. >> >>> That's not a very high bar to clear. svn >>> has the advantage of practically dropping in for cvs in user skills >>> needed. >>> >>> But we could have hoped for more. Still, improvement is improvement. >> We could have hoped for more, but I'm not sure we could have expected it. >> >> People understand centralized command-and-control structures. >> >> What more could be done with a VCS without throwing that out? >> >> -a > > Branches. Tags. Stored metadata. Jobs. Change sets. Top of my head ... >
What does /jobs/ mean? Regards, ..jim -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
