Bob La Quey wrote: > One is using C functions and libraries that do mostly > the same thing that the scripting language is doing. > In some ways it is more economical intellectually to > simply stay in C. Multi hundred line programs do _not_ > have to be inpenetrable if they are well written.
Let's take this line of reasoning to its extreme... Why not just stay in assembly if you got a bucket full of useful assembly routines? Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
