On Nov 23, 2007 1:39 AM, Randall Shimizu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with you, but I don't believe most people understand the full > implications of OpenXML. It's one > to say that OpenXML is propietary, but this gives solid reasons why..
Well, we'd know the "full implications" only if we allowed the thing to play out. But save that, I'm pretty sure I understand what Office Open XML means. Especially since you'd already plugged this story back in October to to [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the http://ooxmlisdefectivebydesign.blogspot.com/ website. Anyone with a couple of brain cells (and even some Windows users) can put the two together and see Microsoft's long long track record with "standards" and formats. Consider me choir. -todd -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
