On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 07:48:31AM -0800, David Brown wrote:
> Declaring something to be public domain and disseminating it freely seem to
> be sufficient.

I read the statutory law and case law Wikipedia refers to.
Computer Software Rental Amendments Act of 1990
looks pretty good.  Because this issue wasn't the crux of that law, we seem to
need to try to decode the implications which isn't comforting.  Seems someone
could still try to challenge it with a costly court case until Congress
addresses this issue directly.


cs


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to