This /. article touches a discussion that (IIRC) occurred here about whether using Amazon for bittorrent seeds would actually work -- or would all the traffic naturally migrate to Amazon as the biggest pipe?
http://slashdot.org/articles/08/03/08/042227.shtml A Norwegian broadcasting company NRK, did this experiment and figures torrent cut their costs to 1700/41000 (~4%) of their estimated non-torrent costs! Anybody see anything to question about this calculation? I can't read the Norwegian, but it doesn't seem they don't have any details about their AWS setup, merely mentioning S3. Regards, ..jim -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
