Tracy R Reed wrote: > Gabriel Sechan wrote: >> Thats why I don't run a spam filter. I'd rather deal with the 5 or 6 >> I get a day than risk an important message being lost. > > I get a thousand a day. 32 have come in since I sent the original mail > about the false positive. Spam filtering is a necessity and well worth > it or I would run an ever greater risk of losing an important email than > if I didn't filter. I've never had anything important land in the junk > folder. Just the occasional mailing list mail. >
Just curious: What do you actually do to look for false positives? - scan 1000 senders & subjects? - scan only those with borderline scores? (any stats?) - run other filters and scan the results or exceptions? Regards, ..jim -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
