** Reply to message from "Todd Walton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 1 Jun 2008 23:24:38 -0500
> It sounds like all they need is a couple of infrequently changing > pages. They won't need search for that. And the 6-10 can learn the > basic steps of editing a wiki. someone already made that point and it would be a waste of time doing a wiki for "a couple of infrequent changing pages". I doubt it's what Lan ment. I'll restate that MY guess at what Lan was suggesting: 6-10 authors of more than "a couple of infrequent changing pages". IMO, wiki's are not generally easy for consumers to use. And without alot of work, the only way to make them somewhat easy for the general public is to have a really good search engine on the frontend. Because of that ---- wait for it ----- the general public will not find browsing a wiki looking for the articles easy or productive. but if there is no real attraction to the site of the information/articles, then putting them on a wiki and making sure the well known search engines can crawl them might be enough. ie, use Google/etc as the way to find the articles instead of having an easy to use "site" containing the articles. Doug -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
