On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Todd Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Chris Louden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Todd Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> 167.190.1.24 (address) and 255.255.255.248 (mask) >>> >>> which yields an IP range of... ? >> >> 167.190.1.25 - 167.190.1.30 >> >>> >>> Sometimes the mask is like 255.255.240.0 or 255.255.255.192. Aagh! >> >> 167.190.0.1 - 167.190.15.254 >> or >> 167.190.1.1 - 167.190.1.62 > > With a network address of 167.190.1.24 and a mask of 255.255.255.192, > wouldn't the range be: > > 167.190.1.25 to 167.190.1.254? > > -todd > > > -- > [email protected] > http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list >
No, your first subnet address would be 192.168.1.64, with a range of 192.168. to 1.65 192.168.1.127, and your second available subnet would be 192.168.1.128, with a range of 192.168.1.129 to 192.168.1.254. Read this http://www.tradecraftsolutions.com/TCSMain/Sub-supernetting.odt for further details. RD -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
