SJS wrote: > Relax the requirement to find an "optimal" solution, and it gets much > easier. > Indeed, there are good solutions to the "relaxed TSP".
--Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
- Re: Analog vs Digital (was Re:... Andrew Lentvorski
- Re: Analog vs Digital (was Re:... Darren New
- Re: Analog vs Digital (was Re:... David Brown
- Re: Analog vs Digital (was Re:... Tracy R Reed
- Re: Analog vs Digital (was Re:... SJS
- Re: Analog vs Digital (was Re:... David Brown
- Re: Analog vs Digital (was Re:... SJS
- Re: Analog vs Digital (was Re:... Darren New
- Re: Analog vs Digital (was Re:... David Brown
- TSP (Was: Analog vs Digital) SJS
- Re: TSP (Was: Analog vs Digita... Christopher Smith
- Re: Analog vs Digital (was Re: Is Schem... Ralph Shumaker
- Re: Analog vs Digital (was Re: Is Scheme/Li... Tom Gal
- Re: Is Scheme/Lisp somehow more "fundamental" ... Tracy R Reed
- Re: Is Scheme/Lisp somehow more "fundamental&q... Brad Beyenhof
- Re: Is Scheme/Lisp somehow more "fundament... chris
- Re: Is Scheme/Lisp somehow more "funda... Andrew Lentvorski
- Re: Is Scheme/Lisp somehow more "f... David Brown
- Re: Is Scheme/Lisp somehow more "f... chris
- Re: Is Scheme/Lisp somehow more &q... Andrew Lentvorski
- Re: Is Scheme/Lisp somehow more "funda... Tracy R Reed
