Darren New wrote:
I'm more on Meyer's side of the fence: if your language has warnings
instead of errors, you've designed it wrong.
Yeah, 'cause we've been able to come up with a language where the
compiler can prove that everything is correct. ;-) Haskell, ML, and to a
lesser degree Eiffel come about as close as you can get, and you can see
they don't exactly have a huge user base for some reason.
Heck, we can't even solve the halting problem.
Anyway, here in the real world we have the option of treating warnings
as errors. I encourage you to investigate this option.
--Chris
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
