Carl, Please forgive me For some reason my msn email is not correctly formatting these messages My /etc/resolv.conf was formatted as you put it but like I said I am losing formatting in these messages Cox gave me a CIDR block of 30 static IP addresses to use I just sent a ping to 68.105.28.11 and these are the results 64 bytes from 68.105.28.11: icmp_seq=20 ttl=60 time=6.13 ms 64 bytes from 68.105.28.11: icmp_seq=28 ttl=60 time=7.42 ms >From 72.214.18.66 icmp_seq=69 Destination Host Unreachable >From 72.214.18.66 icmp_seq=70 Destination Host Unreachable from 72.214.18.66 icmp_seq=71 Destination Host Unreachable 64 bytes from 68.105.28.11: icmp_seq=125 ttl=60 time=6.45 ms it continued on for a while after this To me it seems as if some packets are going through and others are not although I admit I do not know how to correctly interpret these results Thanks, Michael
> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:22:56 -0800 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Connecting with CentOS 5.2 > >> Cox configured the Cisco 2600 router so it doesnt have >> DHCP enabled > > Did Cox tell you what address to use for your computer? Or what range > of addresses to chose one from? > >> The nameservers that I am using are Cox nameservers >> When I type in an adress for example googleit just says "Looking for >> www.google.com" >> >> when I looked in /etc/resolv.conf it says >> >> search localhostnameserver 68.105.28.11nameserver 68.105.29.12 > > Is that what is really in /etc/resolv.conf or have you managed to lose > some newline characters that would put things on separate lines? I > can't read over your shoulder from this far away. I would expect > /etc/resolv.conf to look more like this, given your data. > > search localhost > nameserver 68.105.28.11 > nameserver 68.105.29.12 > >> by the way, Cox gave me these nameservers lastnight, I previously had two >> differentnameserver adresses >> >> When I tried to connect using the IP addressof google it just says >> transferring data from 74.125.95.103 and never does anything else >> > > Is there some way you can fix your email replies so they don't all get > smashed together like the sample below? > >>> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:24:30 -0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: >>> [email protected]> Subject: Re: Connecting with CentOS 5.2>> On >>> Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Michael Lynch wrote:>>>> I have my server >>> connected to a switch which is connected to a Cisco 2600 router>> Cox is my >>> ISP> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:07:40 -0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: >>> [email protected]> Subject: Re: Connecting with CentOS 5.2>> > > Really dumb question: I looked at some of the on-line documentation > for the Cisco 2600. There are several RJ45 sockets on the back. Not > all of them are network connectors. Are you plugged in to the right > hole? Can you see link lights at both ends of the cable? > > Do you get a reply from the Cox nameserver if you issue the command: > ping 68.105.28.11 > I get > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ ping 68.105.28.11 > PING 68.105.28.11 (68.105.28.11) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 68.105.28.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=70.8 ms > 64 bytes from 68.105.28.11: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=69.0 ms > . . . > > carl > -- > carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > [email protected] > http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-newbie -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-newbie
