Avro's should have read that before designing the Vulcan air
brakes....fancy putting those solid slabs upwind of the flying controls..!

See the pairs of yellow lines indicating position.

Regards and a HNY to all our readers
Mac

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Mike via KRnet <krnet at list.krnet.org>
wrote:

> A little science from English researchers in 1957
> http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0323.pdf but I'm sure
> there must be more recent published findings from elsewhere.
>
> This suggests that a solid airbrake produces a bubble of reduced airflow
> behind the brake with airflow velocity fluctuations occurring around the
> edge of the brake which may cause vibrations to the structure. Perforations
> in the airbrake reduce this effect and were found to be more effective
> towards the centre of the plate than around the periphery.
>
> From the Pprune forum, this explanation was offered: "Perforation reduces
> buffeting downrange of the speed brake, and reduces its interference with
> flying surfaces or the fuselage or wing or horizontal stab. Remember, the
> speed brake is there to create drag, but not undesirable flight
> characteristics. A perforated brake doesn't create nearly the airflow
> disruption, pitch change, or load on the surrounding and supporting
> structure that a solid brake might create. The number and placement of
> holes
> are important considerations, and part of the design. Holes permit a
> lighter
> structure that takes less of an airload, reducing not only the weight of
> the
> brake assembly but the force required to actuate it and the structure
> around
> it that must support the load. Remember that much of the time, that speed
> brake isn't anything but dead weight."
>
> Mike Mold
> Devon, UK.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: KRnet [mailto:krnet-bounces at list.krnet.org] On Behalf Of Mac
> McConnell-Wood via KRnet
> Sent: 31 December 2014 10:35
> To: Herbert F?rle; KRnet
> Subject: Re: KR> Bellyboard
>
> The RAF Vulcan bomber had solid airbrakes-no holes (which enabled this 90
> ton delta to descend vertically-..been there..)
> Mac
>
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Herbert F?rle <krnet at list.krnet.org>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > ....any Test,however it is performed,gives a lot of informations! The
> > aerodynamic principles are always the same ,also in the case of the hot"
> > bellyboard -drag" discusion.For me it's important the location of the
> board
> > and I think the place underneath the rearspar is very well chosen ( far
> > enough behind the CG ,to give the Kr a small amount of direction
> stability
> > like a dragchute and the waketurbulences does'nt hit the HS !) I 'm
> > convinced,a board without holes  are more effectiv ( one big
> waketurbulence
> > produce more drag compared to many small ones).
> > I'm also think,a big advantage of the bellyboard is the fact ,that you
> can
> > lower the nose of the Kr on final for better sight( wether you have to
> push
> > or pull the stik )!
> > Herbert
> > German Kr builder .
> >
> >
> > Von meinem iPad gesendet
> > _______________________________________________
> > Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> > To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> > see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to
> change
> > options
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: VULCAN b2.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 162620 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://list.krnet.org/mailman/private/krnet_list.krnet.org/attachments/20141231/906b3fb1/attachment.jpg>

Reply via email to