I'm building an 's' and its not in mine. Much of the strength is in the 
ply.......
However I like the idea, although I would have rounded the foam to give the 
fuselage a more voluptuous shape!
Peter Drake
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert L. Stone" <rsto...@hot.rr.com>
To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: KR> new pics


> Ron,
>     It's been a good many years since I built so I was surprised to see
> foam being used on the fuselage.  When I built my KR-2 from 1976 to 1978 
> the
> fuselage was just spruce and plywood skin.  It looks like from the 
> pictures
> you are using foam and then glassing over it?  This is the way the plans
> called for building the tail feathers, upper fudelage and wings but not 
> the
> bottom fuselage.  Is this called for in the "S" plans or just your own
> design?
>
> Bob Stone, Harker Heights, Tex
> rsto...@hot.rr.com
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ron Smith" <mercedesm...@yahoo.com>
> To: <kr...@mylist.net>; "ROGER" <rogerthres...@sbcglobal.net>; "Sandy"
> <sand...@comcast.net>; "sandy42" <sand...@attbi.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 1:13 AM
> Subject: KR> new pics
>
>
>> Hello Knetters,
>>
>> I have some new pics for you
>>
>> http://ronsmith.myphotoalbum.com/albums.php
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ron Smith,
>> Cypress Ca, U.S.
>>
>> Kr2s boat stage
>>
>> _______________________________________
>> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
>> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
>> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> ---
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.11/26 - Release Date: 22/06/2005
>
> 


Reply via email to