You would have a lot more info on it than me, but just doing a quick AI
query got me some interesting solutions to the E10 storage issue.

https://chatgpt.com/share/693469dc-5fa8-8001-a1ba-cc832b28f233


On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 9:24 AM Adam Deem via KRnet <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Yes, rotax engines and factory built aircraft that are designed where the
> entire fuel system is ethanol tolerant are fine to run on it because the
> components are ok with the chemicals that are in it.  They aslo need to be
> tolerant of a little dissolved water content.  Even then it doesn’t store
> well and non-ethanol is better for infrequent use.
>
> Adam
>
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 12:11 PM Steve Loebs via KRnet <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Doesn't Rotax have an approx 80% market share in the new light aircraft
>> market? Don't Rotax owners use E10 91 AKI primarily (and fall back to 100LL
>> for long cross country trips)? We know those planes have fuel systems built
>> to handle E10.
>>
>> The new UL350i engines are designed for E10 87 AKI and are less expensive
>> than Rotax 914UL and have full FADEC and EFI.
>>
>> Larry mentioned that many KR owners only fly about 50 hours a year. If
>> one flies a lot, say 200 hours a year, then the math shows that the savings
>> in fuel expense by saving $2-3 per gallon running E10-87 is so significant
>> that a 100LL engine would need to be virtually free to breakeven!
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 8:33 AM Adam Deem via KRnet <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The problem with pump gas is that even with advertised free fuel one of
>>> two issues can arise:
>>>
>>> 1. Even ethanol-free pump gas can have detergents and additives that can
>>> have unexpected reactions with tank sealants and resins.
>>>
>>> 2. Many stations don’t have a separate manifold for ethanol-free so when
>>> you select it you still get pumped a gallon or more of ethanol laden gas
>>> before the manifold is cleared and the ethanol free is delivered to the
>>> nozzle.
>>>
>>> Only use mogas from an airport or station where there is no chance of
>>> mixing or contamination from other fuels.  And even then test it with a
>>> test jar.
>>>
>>> Adam
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 10:53 AM Richard Kaczmarek via KRnet <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you want to be able to run the actual car gas the tanks should have
>>>> 2 to 3 coats of Rhino 9700. It is an epoxy but has a Novolac backbone which
>>>> stops the effects of alcohol on epoxy. I have been using it for many years
>>>> from my days of building Lancair's and the 2 KR2's I completed. Neat thing
>>>> about 9700 is it is also a structural resin. It does enter B stage very
>>>> quickly even on cool days.
>>>>
>>>> Richard Kaczmarek
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Dec 6, 2025, 10:33 AM Joe Horton via KRnet <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Good Morning Folks,
>>>>>       I am sharing this story again as a warning to anyone with epoxy
>>>>> tanks.
>>>>> On the way back from the gathering in Tennessee I think in 2011, I
>>>>> chased the cold front home all day with landing multiple times to wait for
>>>>> it to move ahead of me. I ended up landing somewhere south of Harrisburg
>>>>> PA. about 10 min after the FBO closed and they had no self serve. A local
>>>>> took me to a sonoco and I got 5 gal of 93 oct.  (ya know the NAS Car 
>>>>> racing
>>>>> fuel) and put in the header tank with several galllons of 100LL that was
>>>>> still in the tank. I flew for another 50 miles or so and had to call it 
>>>>> for
>>>>> the night 50 miles from home. Left early the next morning and got home and
>>>>> to work before 7 am.  I think that I flew again on maybe Wednesday or
>>>>> Thursday of the same week and noticed a bit of roughness in the engine
>>>>> operation. My memory is a bit foggy on the details of why I started to
>>>>> investigate but at somepoint that weekend I looked into the header tank 
>>>>> and
>>>>> the erosion of the gel coat inside the tank was so evident. There was a
>>>>> line exactly where the fuel level had been when I put the 5 gal of Sunoco
>>>>> in. There were glass cloth fibers exposed. I drained and cut tank open and
>>>>> repaired it, but started to wonder about the epoxy that had erroded off 
>>>>> the
>>>>> inside. I tore down all the intake and aerocarb and found a coating of the
>>>>> epoxy (vinyl ester) inside all the intake tubes and in the carb. I pulled
>>>>> heads but it appeared that the epoxy that may have gotten to the cobustion
>>>>> chamber burned with the fuel. What a mess.
>>>>>      This was the first time that N357CJ had seen auto fuel in the 6
>>>>> or 7 years of operations.
>>>>> I did try it at an airport in South Caolina at a Corvair college with
>>>>> non alcohol fuel and the engine ran so rough I drained it back out gave it
>>>>> to a local and filled up with 100LL. The plane never saw any auto fuel
>>>>> again. Mark L. has the plane now but to the best of my knowlege the wing
>>>>> tanks are still fine and the header tank has another 14 years or so on it
>>>>> Total of over 20 years now.
>>>>>       My current build has aluminum tanks in the wings so that should
>>>>> not ever be an issue. The header tank was home built with just over 8 gal
>>>>> capacity and has had fuel in it for nearly 4 years now. I do look in every
>>>>> so often just for peace of mind. I for one will never take that risk again
>>>>> for the sake of roughly $2 a gallon difference.
>>>>> Like Larry always says "your results may vary" but I doubt it...
>>>>> Joe Horton
>>>>> Dr. Deans plane ready for inspection..N657CJ
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> *From: *Kayak <[email protected]>
>>>>> *To: *KRnet <[email protected]>
>>>>> *Cc: *Kayak <[email protected]>
>>>>> *Date: *Thursday, 4 December 2025 9:55 PM EST
>>>>> *Subject: *KRnet> ethanol - anyone running it
>>>>>
>>>>> is anyone here running ordinary e10 ethanol car gas?
>>>>>
>>>>> just throwing out the question because almost all cars (including old
>>>>> ones) are running on it, so it should be possible to accommodate it in an
>>>>> aircraft. another option is to have a tank with 100ll just for
>>>>> cristical flight phases like takeoff and climbout, and run the much 
>>>>> cheaper
>>>>> car gas off the other tank for the cruise phase...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> KRnet mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> KRnet mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
>>>>
>>> --
>>> KRnet mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
>>>
>> --
>> KRnet mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
>>
> --
> KRnet mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
>
-- 
KRnet mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet

Reply via email to