Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Roland Mainz <roland.mainz at nrubsig.org> wrote:
>
> > Mhhh... would it be a good idea to make a standalone wrapper (e.g. |int
> > main(int ac, char **av, char **env) { return b_uname(ac, av, env); }|)
> > around the ksh93 builtin and stuff it into /usr/xpg4/bin/ ? That may be
> > a cheap way to get a POSIX-conformant "uname" into that directory... :-)
>
> Why do you believe that /usr/bin/uname is not POSIX compliant?
Let me re-phrase that statement: "... a cheap way to get a version of
'uname' into that directory which does not have Solaris-specific
extensions (e.g. allows the creation of portable scripts without the
risk of falling into the 'OS-specific-extension'-trap again)". Better ?
:-)
----
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
/O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090
(;O/ \/ \O;)
