>>>>> "Roland" == Roland Mainz <roland.mainz at nrubsig.org> writes:
>> The failure with path.sh was with BUILD_KSH93_AS_BINKSH=1. I only >> tried it once. Roland> Can you try it again, preferably with B37 to avoid we're seeing Roland> any "ghost" bugs caused by any Roland> libc/libsocket/libnsl/libm/etc.-flag day or other kind of Roland> disturbance ? I'll try again, though I probably won't get to it until after OSCon (24-28 July). >> either get the fix from upstream, or skip the test. Roland> Erm... the test is currently treated in a way which makes a Roland> failure non-fatal. Isn't this enougth ? If the test failures are truly non-fatal, I could live with that, especially since you're doing a good job of noting in Makefile.com which tests are expected to fail. But my build died as a result of the test failures. Maybe that was due to the failure in io.sh? >> We might even want to change cmd/ksh/Makefile.com so that "all" >> doesn't depend on "testshell". Roland> Umpf... only if we can't resolve the failures this week, Ok ? I Roland> would be very unhappy with loosing the tests as part of the Roland> default build Yeah, I like the automated regression tests, too. I'm not sure that "make all" is the right phase to run the tests, but it's not obvious to me that "install" or "check" is any better. So, anyway, this would be a last resort. mike
