Mike Kupfer wrote:
> >> The failure with path.sh was with BUILD_KSH93_AS_BINKSH=1.  I only
> >> tried it once.
> 
> Roland> Can you try it again, preferably with B37 to avoid we're seeing
> Roland> any "ghost" bugs caused by any
> Roland> libc/libsocket/libnsl/libm/etc.-flag day or other kind of
> Roland> disturbance ?
> 
> I'll try again, though I probably won't get to it until after OSCon
> (24-28 July).

;-(

I guess you won't hit that issue again - see below...

> >> either get the fix from upstream, or skip the test.
> 
> Roland> Erm... the test is currently treated in a way which makes a
> Roland> failure non-fatal. Isn't this enougth ?
> 
> If the test failures are truly non-fatal, I could live with that,
> especially since you're doing a good job of noting in Makefile.com which
> tests are expected to fail.  But my build died as a result of the test
> failures.  Maybe that was due to the failure in io.sh?

Yes - because it wasn't marked as non-fatal before
http://polaris.blastwave.org/changeset/330 ... starting with this commit
a failure of the "io.sh" is no longer fatal (and with
http://polaris.blastwave.org/changeset/336 I changed the test procedure
a little bit to get "io.sh" working completely again (er... yes... I am
cheating there... ;-/ ) because it fails early which may hide other,
more serious problems).

> >> We might even want to change cmd/ksh/Makefile.com so that "all"
> >> doesn't depend on "testshell".
> 
> Roland> Umpf... only if we can't resolve the failures this week, Ok ?  I
> Roland> would be very unhappy with loosing the tests as part of the
> Roland> default build
> 
> Yeah, I like the automated regression tests, too.  I'm not sure that
> "make all" is the right phase to run the tests, but it's not obvious to
> me that "install" or "check" is any better.  So, anyway, this would be a
> last resort.

What about creating a specialised "regresstest:" Makefile target for
this purpose ?

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)

Reply via email to