James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> wrote:
> Roland Mainz writes:
> > > A suggestion from a PSARC member was to keep /bin/ksh (Solaris's
> > > ksh) as is, until it is replaced by ksh93, rather than introducing
> > > these new obscure names for Solaris's ksh.
> >
> > Which name and ksh versions do you mean ? Current Solaris ksh or ksh93 ?
>
> The "obscure names" were "oksh" and "nksh." I don't think either
> exists on any other platform.
>From what I've read here, it seems that the current ksh on Solaris is neither
ksh88 nor ksh93. Do you have a better Idea than calling it oksh?
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
