????? ???????????? wrote:
> 2009/11/5 Vladimir Kotal <Vladimir.Kotal at sun.com>:
>> ????? ???????????? wrote:
>>> ksh93 update 2 landed in build 128
>>>
>>> [http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-announce/2009-November/001318.html].
>>>
>>> Can you confirm or deny that the update fixed your problem, please?
>> With machine bfu'ed with onnv-gate:2009-11-04 (daily bits) and fresh
>> {SUNWstc-tetlite,SUNWstc-net-nc} packages I am no longer seeing the behavior
>> with extra helper process.
>
> OK. Would you write a small test case which reproduces the the extra
> helper process bug, please? I like to include this in the ksh93 test
> suite.
I tried to replicate this behavior in standalone ksh script when I
realized nc test suite does not work with ksh93 but was not successful;
this worked fine:
#!/usr/bin/ksh
NC=/usr/bin/nc
eval "${NC} -l 4444 &"
integer pid="$!"
print "pid $pid"
The value of the 'pid' variable was the same as the pid of the nc process.
There is probably something in CTI-TET environment which triggers this
behavior.
For the rflag test purpose I will look into what is the actual problem
there.
v.
