What are you doing with port-forward inside your pod?

Binding to 0 is the "normal" way to do things unless you have reason to dO
otherwise.

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Dietrich Schultz
<dietrich.schu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just started exploring kubernetes, and ran into this. Haven't found any docs
> or clear statements of best practice. The only thing I found was this note
> in the container.v1 spec describing the port field:
>
>> Any port which is listening on the default "0.0.0.0" address inside a
>> container will be accessible from the network.
>
>
> While interesting, it doesn't quite answer my question. I've found that if
> my app binds to pod_ip then I can't use kubectl port-forward. If I bind to
> 127.0.0.1 then port-forward works, but I can't connect from other pods. Only
> binding to 0.0.0.0 seems to work for both cases. Is this intentional? Is
> binding to 0.0.0.0 considered a best practice or is kubectl deficient? Is
> this requirement/best practice documented somewhere?
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • [kubernetes-users]... Dietrich Schultz
    • Re: [kubernet... 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A

Reply via email to