Luca wrote:
> On 8/19/07, Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +static uint64_t qemu_next_deadline(void) {
>> + uint64_t nearest_delta_us = ULLONG_MAX;
>> + uint64_t vmdelta_us;
>>
>
> Hum, I introduced a bug here... those vars should be signed.
>
> On the overhead introduced: how do you measure it?
>
>
Run a 100Hz guest, measure cpu usage using something accurate like
cyclesoak, with and without dynticks, with and without kvm.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to
panic.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
