Dor Laor wrote:
> Haydn Solomon wrote: 
> I have a question on guest smp performance. If I have a host with core
2 duo, should > a kvm guest perform better using -smp 2 as opposed to
not using -smp 2?
> Well, it depends:
> In general Avi measured 40% performance increase for using a second
cpu in the guest. This was long time ago,
> before the in-kernel-apic implementation. It might improve the gain of
the additional cpu.

> On the other hand, for 32 bit windows, using ACPI HAL has pretty big
overhead at the moment. Since it is a must
> for smp guest, it might be slower than running non-acpi single cpu VM.


It is possible that 64 bit SMP windows have much less overhead than 32
bit, e.g if the processors are later than Core 2

> My guess is that you better use -smp 2.
> Dor.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to