Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Avi,
>
> [somehow your mails do not get through to my private account, so I'm
> switching]
>
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>     
>>> Clarification: I can't precisely tell what code is executed in VM mode,
>>> as I don't have qemu or that guest instrumented. I just see the kernel
>>> entering VM mode and leaving it again more than 300 us later. So I
>>> wonder why this is allowed while some external IRQ is pending.
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> How do you know an external interrupt is pending?
>>     
>
> It's the host timer IRQ, programmed to fire in certain intervals (100 us
> here). Test case is some latency measurement tool like tglx's cyclictest
> or similar programs we use in Xenomai.
>
>   
>> kvm programs the hardware to exit when an external interrupt arrives.
>>
>>     
>
> Here is a latency trace I just managed to capture over 2.6.23.1-rt1 with 
> latest kvm from git hacked into (kvm generally seems to work fine this way):
>
> ...
> qemu-sys-7543  0...1 13897us : vmcs_write16+0xb/0x20 
> (vmx_save_host_state+0x1a7/0x1c0)
> qemu-sys-7543  0...1 13897us : vmcs_writel+0xb/0x30 (vmcs_write16+0x1e/0x20)
> qemu-sys-7543  0...1 13898us : segment_base+0xc/0x70 
> (vmx_save_host_state+0xa0/0x1c0)
> qemu-sys-7543  0...1 13898us : vmcs_writel+0xb/0x30 
> (vmx_save_host_state+0xb0/0x1c0)
> qemu-sys-7543  0...1 13898us : segment_base+0xc/0x70 
> (vmx_save_host_state+0xbf/0x1c0)
> qemu-sys-7543  0...1 13898us : vmcs_writel+0xb/0x30 
> (vmx_save_host_state+0xcf/0x1c0)
> qemu-sys-7543  0...1 13898us : load_msrs+0xb/0x40 
> (vmx_save_host_state+0xe7/0x1c0)
> qemu-sys-7543  0...1 13898us : kvm_load_guest_fpu+0x8/0x40 
> (kvm_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xbf/0x570)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D..1 13899us : vmx_vcpu_run+0xc/0x110 
> (kvm_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x120/0x570)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D..1 13899us!: vmcs_writel+0xb/0x30 (vmx_vcpu_run+0x22/0x110)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D..1 14344us : vmcs_read32+0xb/0x20 (vmx_vcpu_run+0xc7/0x110)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D..1 14345us : vmcs_readl+0x8/0x10 (vmcs_read32+0x16/0x20)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D..1 14345us : vmcs_read32+0xb/0x20 (vmx_vcpu_run+0xf4/0x110)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D..1 14345us+: vmcs_readl+0x8/0x10 (vmcs_read32+0x16/0x20)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D..1 14349us : irq_enter+0xb/0x30 (do_IRQ+0x45/0xc0)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D.h1 14350us : do_IRQ+0x73/0xc0 (f8caae24     0     0)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D.h1 14351us : handle_level_irq+0xe/0x120 (do_IRQ+0x7d/0xc0)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D.h1 14351us : __spin_lock+0xc/0x30 
> (handle_level_irq+0x24/0x120)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D.h2 14352us : mask_and_ack_8259A+0x14/0x120 
> (handle_level_irq+0x37/0x120)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D.h2 14352us+: __spin_lock_irqsave+0x11/0x60 
> (mask_and_ack_8259A+0x2a/0x120)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D.h3 14357us : __spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xc/0x60 
> (mask_and_ack_8259A+0x7a/0x120)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D.h2 14358us : redirect_hardirq+0x8/0x70 
> (handle_level_irq+0x72/0x120)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D.h2 14358us : __spin_unlock+0xb/0x40 
> (handle_level_irq+0x8e/0x120)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D.h1 14358us : handle_IRQ_event+0xe/0x110 
> (handle_level_irq+0x9a/0x120)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D.h1 14359us : timer_interrupt+0xb/0x60 
> (handle_IRQ_event+0x67/0x110)
> qemu-sys-7543  0D.h1 14359us : hrtimer_interrupt+0xe/0x1f0 
> (timer_interrupt+0x20/0x60)
> ...
>
> One can see 345 us latency between vm-enter and vm-exit in vmx_vcpu_run -
> and this while cyclictest runs at a period of 100 us!
>
> I got the same results over Adeos/I-pipe & Xenomai with the function
> tracer there, also pointing to the period while the CPU is in VM mode.
>
> Anyone any ideas? Greg, I put you on CC as you said you once saw "decent
> latencies" with your patches. Are there still magic bits missing in
> official kvm?
>   

No bits missing as far as I know.  It should just work.

Can you explain some more about the latenct tracer?  How does it work? 
Seeing vmx_vcpu_run() in there confuses me, as it always runs with
interrupts disabled (it does dispatch NMIs, so we could be seeing an NMI).

Please post a disassembly of your vmx_vcpu_run so we can interpret the
offsets.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to 
panic.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to