Farkas Levente wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Farkas Levente wrote: >> >>> hi, >>> it seems the latest kvm-50 working with smp both with 32 and 64 bit >>> centos-5 are now running (ie not crash), what's more it's even working >>> if i trun back (ie on) acpi. but it seems much more slower with 2 guests >>> 4 vcpu then kvm-36 with 2 guests single cpu. is so much slower then it >>> can be recognized even just http response or anything else:-( >>> another problem the windows xp guest eat 100% all the time. >>> >>> >>> >> Without FlexPriority (or tpr patching) Windows SMP is very slow. It >> shouldn't take 100% cpu though. If this is immediately after boot, wait >> a couple of minutes to let Windows load all its services. >> > > but not just the windows are slow even all linux centos-5 32 and 64 bit > version are _very_ slow much more slower than kvm-46 even the user > experience is a few times slower the with kvm-46 with single cpu! > >
That shouldn't happen. Which kvm version introduced the problem (anything between -46 and -50)? Did you change anything other than kvm? -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
