Avi Kivity wrote: > Farkas Levente wrote: >> Avi Kivity wrote: >> >>> Farkas Levente wrote: >>> >>>> hi, >>>> it seems the latest kvm-50 working with smp both with 32 and 64 bit >>>> centos-5 are now running (ie not crash), what's more it's even working >>>> if i trun back (ie on) acpi. but it seems much more slower with 2 >>>> guests >>>> 4 vcpu then kvm-36 with 2 guests single cpu. is so much slower then it >>>> can be recognized even just http response or anything else:-( >>>> another problem the windows xp guest eat 100% all the time. >>>> >>>> >>> Without FlexPriority (or tpr patching) Windows SMP is very slow. It >>> shouldn't take 100% cpu though. If this is immediately after boot, wait >>> a couple of minutes to let Windows load all its services. >>> >> >> but not just the windows are slow even all linux centos-5 32 and 64 bit >> version are _very_ slow much more slower than kvm-46 even the user >> experience is a few times slower the with kvm-46 with single cpu! >> >> > > That shouldn't happen. Which kvm version introduced the problem > (anything between -46 and -50)? Did you change anything other than kvm?
we don't change anything else (except try to use smp in guest and update to 50). i don't know which version. i know kvm-46 with single cpu was working in a reasonable speed while kvm-50 is about 10 times (!) slower with 4 vcpu. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
