Zhang, Xiantao wrote: > >> - hardware enable/disable/setup/unsetup/check_processor_compat does >> not make any sense for us: all CPUs that have been sold since the >> 1970s have proper hardware virtualization, and there's nothing to >> enable - it just works. >> > OK, Maybe we can move them to arch-specific. > > Avi, How about your ideas?
I'm actually least qualified to comment since I only know about x86. Since this is all preparations before actual code is seen, it's hard to see where things are flowing. I don't mind if a few mistakes are made along the way that are corrected later, as long as x86 continues to build and run fine. It's okay to start working on this problem with a 10-pound hammer and move to atomic force microscopy once things are merged. So, I will be very much inclined to accept anything that has gained the consensus of the arch maintainers. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
