Carsten Otte wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > >> For the present discussion, I agree, but in general we should be >> prepared to accept some no-op callouts. >> > > Oh sure, I don't mind those. We'll have plenty of them, where other > architectures will need to take action and s390 won't. It's just that > in the current location, the common code would do > > common_func() { > loop { > arch_callback(); > } > } > And I suggested to make the whole thing a callback. >
Ah, agreed. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel