Neo Jia wrote: >>>> >>>>> Another question is about the architecture, I found it seems that the >>>>> 32-bit platform is much more stable than 64-bit. Should I switch my >>>>> system to 64-bit for later work? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Where do you get this impression? I do almost all of my development on >>>> 64-bit, and I don't recall an issue that was 64-bit host specific. >>>> >>>> >>> Sorry about that ... >>> >>> because I always saw "host 64-bit" in the bug report although maybe >>> they are not 64-bit host specific problem. >>> >>> >> Yes. Most testing (and production use) is done on 64-bit hosts, since >> virtualization is memory-intensive. Also, you can test more types of >> guests this way. Almost all virtualization-capable processors are >> also 64-bit capable. >> > So, does that mean I need to install a 64-bit host to make the reproduce > easier? >
A 32-bit host is fine, if you don't run 64-bit guests. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
