On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 18:37:13 +0200, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carsten Otte wrote: > > This patch removes the include of "irq.h" in kvm_main.c, s390 does not > > have irqs. For that, kvm_cpu_has_interrupt becomes an architecutre > > specific function which can check for external or I/O interrupts on s390 > > and for irqs on x86 and others. In order to clarify wording, the > > function defined by irq.h has been renamed to kvm_cpu_has_irq. > > > > I generally understand "irq" to mean the interrupt request line, and > "interrupt" to mean a vectored interrupt (post interrupt controller). > In those terms the naming in correct. However I'm not at all certain > this naming convention is generally accepted. Well, at least IO-Interrupts on s390 don't really fit this model from my point of view. (In fact, we can even get IO-Interrupts that are not associated with any (channel) device at all). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
