Zhang, Xiantao wrote: > Hi, Avi > Since IA64's irqchip is always in kernel side, so we don't need > kvm_vcpu_ioctl_interrupt for irq delivery. Should we moved it to arch? > Otherwise, we have to define two unnecessary fields(irq_summary and > irq_pending) for vcpu structure for compile pass. >
Yes, it can be x86 specific (or arch specific if somebody else wants it). -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
