Anthony Liguori wrote: > Dong, Eddie wrote: >> Anthony: >> Actually I am wondering if the binary used for VMMCALL could be >> assumed will never be used by Intel processor or vice versa. BTW, >> what is the nenefit to remove hypercall page, which provide more >> clean approach IMO? >> > > A hypercall page doesn't help the situation with respect to migration > between an AMD and Intel system.
I guess I miss something. As if hypercall page is read only after creation (by VMM), later memory migration won't overlap it. The page could be a "Reserved" in e820 table. thx, eddie ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
