On Monday 21 January 2008 18:28:32 Carsten Otte wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > The PIT may not be limited to x86 platforms. So I would propose to make > > the setup more generic and flexible. And I would move the code out of > > arch/x86, just the speaker support should remain there. > > It should also not be common among all archs. On s390 we have CPU > timer, which is way superior to PIT (clock cycle granularity, no > vmexit to set it up or deliver the irq, no hypervisor support needed > because it works transparent).
Yeah, I also checked IA64 side, and it didn't got PIT too. So I put it in x86 directory. -- Thanks Yang, Sheng ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
