Yang, Sheng wrote: > I updated patch using ktime_get() (Is it too heavy?). > >
Shouldn't be. At least on modern hosts. > And currently all the muldiv64() is used to divide 1e9, which can be > insteaded > by ">> 30" approximately. What's your opinion? > Accuracy is more important. And modern processors eat 64-bit divides for breakfast, they're certainly much less expensive than vmexits. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
