Yang, Sheng wrote: > Here is the updated patch: > > Applied, thanks.
> @@ -1714,6 +1788,8 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > vmx_fpu_activate(&vmx->vcpu); > update_exception_bitmap(&vmx->vcpu); > > + vpid_sync_all(); > + > return 0; > > This causes the new instruction to be executed unconditionally, which would #UD on older processors, no? I replaced it with vpid_sync_vcpu_all() which seems sufficient, or do I miss something? -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
