On Friday 25 January 2008 14:52:47 Avi Kivity wrote: > Yang, Sheng wrote: > > Here is the updated patch: > > Applied, thanks. > > > @@ -1714,6 +1788,8 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > vmx_fpu_activate(&vmx->vcpu); > > update_exception_bitmap(&vmx->vcpu); > > > > + vpid_sync_all(); > > + > > return 0; > > This causes the new instruction to be executed unconditionally, which > would #UD on older processors, no? I replaced it with > vpid_sync_vcpu_all() which seems sufficient, or do I miss something?
I think it's OK for there is a judgment in __invvpid() to see if machine has the ability(also if it is allowed to using VPID). :) Thanks! -- Thanks Yang, Sheng ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
