Alexey Eremenko wrote: >> Generally I see no problem with it. But at least for NPT I don't see a >> reason why someone should want to disable it on a VM basis (as far as it >> works stable). Avi, what do you think? >> >> > > 1. This is more user-friendly and easier-to-find >
I'm inclined to disagree. Why add an additional thing for people to tune if they really shouldn't need to. Once NPT/EPT support are stable, is there any reason to want to disable it? Regards, Anthony Liguori > 2. A lot of people would like to view (and Demo) it side-by-side. > > 3. Useful for BETA-testing of KVM. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
