Glauber Costa wrote:
> mark processors as present through the _STA method
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl b/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl
> index e900795..cd42e23 100755
> --- a/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl
> +++ b/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl
> @@ -25,9 +25,28 @@ DefinitionBlock (
>      0x1                 // OEM Revision
>      )
>  {
> +   Scope (\_PR)
> +   {
> +        Processor (CPU0, 0x00, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU1, 0x01, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU2, 0x02, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU3, 0x03, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU4, 0x04, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU5, 0x05, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU6, 0x06, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU7, 0x07, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU8, 0x08, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU9, 0x09, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPUA, 0x0a, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPUB, 0x0b, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPUC, 0x0c, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPUD, 0x0d, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPUE, 0x0e, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { 
> Return(0x1)}}
> +    }
>   

There is now code in rombios32.c to do this.  It needs to be removed.  
See acpi_build_processor_ssdt().

>  
>      Scope (\)
>      {
> +
>          /* CMOS memory access */
>          OperationRegion (CMS, SystemIO, 0x70, 0x02)
>          Field (CMS, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
>   

-

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to