Avi Kivity wrote: > Glauber Costa wrote: >>> >>> There is now code in rombios32.c to do this. It needs to be >>> removed. See acpi_build_processor_ssdt(). >> >> Building the table by hand is trivial in the case where the processors >> are just _listed_, and can be easily justified. This first patch just >> add the _STA method, but other follows, which turns the processor >> block into a quite complicated thing. Not to mention the operational >> region, >> the notifications that have to refer to the processor objects, etc. >> >> So I can't see any valid justification for using the code in >> rombios32.c, instead of a high level language such as the one provided >> by acpi. > > I meant, remove the code in rombios32.c. Sorry about the confusion. > Oh, so that's okay ;-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
