On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 01:52:50AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 04:14:08PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > Erm. This would also be needed by RDMA etc. > > The only RDMA I know is Quadrics, and Quadrics apparently doesn't need > to schedule inside the invalidate methods AFIK, so I doubt the above > is true. It'd be interesting to know if IB is like Quadrics and it > also doesn't require blocking to invalidate certain remote mappings.
We got an answer from the IB guys already. They do not track which of their handles are being used by remote processes so neither approach will work for their purposes with the exception of straight unmaps. In that case, they could use the callout to remove TLB information and rely on the lack of page table information to kill the users process. Without changes to their library spec, I don't believe anything further is possible. If they did change their library spec, I believe they could get things to work the same way that XPMEM has gotten things to work, where a message is sent to the remote side for TLB clearing and that will require sleeping. Thanks, Robin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
