On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I don't have a strong opinion if it should become a semaphore > unconditionally or only with a CONFIG_XPMEM=y. But keep in mind > preempt-rt runs quite a bit slower, or we could rip spinlocks out of > the kernel in the first place ;)
D you just skip comments of people on the mmu_notifier? It took me to remind you about Andrew's comments to note those. And I just responded on the XPmem issue in the morning. Again for the gazillionth time: There will be no CONFIG_XPMEM because the functionality needs to be generic and not XPMEM specific. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
