On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 12:38 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Part of the feedback we received from Fabrice about the KVM patches
> for QEMU
> is that we should create a separate device for the in-kernel APIC to
> avoid
> having lots of if (kvm_enabled()) within the APIC code that were
> difficult to
> understand why there were needed.
> 
> This patch separates the in-kernel PIT into a separate device.  It
> also
> introduces some configure logic to only compile in support for the
> in-kernel
> PIT if it's available.
> 
> The result of this is that we now only need a single if
> (kvm_enabled()) to
> determine which device to use.  Besides making it more upstream
> friendly, I
> think this makes the code much easier to understand.
> 

Seems like a good idea.

[snip]
..



> +static void pit_reset(void *opaque)
> +{
> +    PITState *pit = opaque;
> +    PITChannelState *s;
> +    int i;
> +
> +    for(i = 0;i < 3; i++) {
> +        s = &pit->channels[i];
> +        s->mode = 3;
> +        s->gate = (i != 2);
> +        pit_load_count(s, 0);
> +    }
> +}
> +

Seems like pit_reset won't change the in-kernel pit state.
Actually this should handled as a part of more general reset ioctl to
all of kvm's in-kernel devices.

Cheers,
Dor


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to