Yang, Sheng wrote: > And we got two choices in userspace: one ioctl to reset all kvm devices, or > one ioctl for each device. For we are separating in kernel device into > separate devices, seems the later is more proper. But would it bring other > troubles like inconsistent state for smp? > >
I agree that a separate ioctl would introduce smp problems, so I think one ioctl that resets all devices and all vcpus is the way to go. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
