On 4/14/08, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nguyen Anh Quynh wrote: > > > > > This patch fixes a wrong calculation in the physical address of > > extboot (qemu/hw/extboot.c). Looks like a typo. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nguyen Anh Quynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > diff --git a/qemu/hw/extboot.c b/qemu/hw/extboot.c > > index 056fb59..0dac34c 100644 > > --- a/qemu/hw/extboot.c > > +++ b/qemu/hw/extboot.c > > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void extboot_write_cmd(void *opaque, uint32_t > addr, uint32_t value) > > get_translated_chs(bs, &cylinders, &heads, §ors); > > if (cmd->type == 0x01 || cmd->type == 0x02) { > > - target_ulong pa = cmd->xfer.segment * 16 + cmd->xfer.segment; > > + target_ulong pa = cmd->xfer.segment * 16 + cmd->xfer.offset; > > /* possible buffer overflow */ > > if ((pa + cmd->xfer.nb_sectors * 512) > phys_ram_size) > > > > > > In practice, this check isn't actually necessary since a guest always has > at least 1MB of memory.
Agreed. But it needs to be fixed, anyway. Or we can remove it. Thanks, Q ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel