On 4/14/08, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nguyen Anh Quynh wrote:
>
> >
> > This patch fixes a wrong calculation in the physical address of
> > extboot (qemu/hw/extboot.c). Looks like a typo.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nguyen Anh Quynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  diff --git a/qemu/hw/extboot.c b/qemu/hw/extboot.c
> > index 056fb59..0dac34c 100644
> > --- a/qemu/hw/extboot.c
> > +++ b/qemu/hw/extboot.c
> > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void extboot_write_cmd(void *opaque, uint32_t
> addr, uint32_t value)
> >     get_translated_chs(bs, &cylinders, &heads, &sectors);
> >       if (cmd->type == 0x01 || cmd->type == 0x02) {
> > -       target_ulong pa = cmd->xfer.segment * 16 + cmd->xfer.segment;
> > +       target_ulong pa = cmd->xfer.segment * 16 + cmd->xfer.offset;
> >          /* possible buffer overflow */
> >        if ((pa + cmd->xfer.nb_sectors * 512) > phys_ram_size)
> >
> >
>
>  In practice, this check isn't actually necessary since a guest always has
> at least 1MB of memory.

Agreed. But it needs to be fixed, anyway. Or we can remove it.

Thanks,
Q

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to