Nguyen Anh Quynh wrote: > On 4/14/08, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> In practice, this check isn't actually necessary since a guest always has >> at least 1MB of memory. >> > > Agreed. But it needs to be fixed, anyway. Or we can remove it. >
I should mention, the reason for removing the check, is that what we really want to do is remove all references to phys_ram_base() and replace them with cpu_physical_memory_{read,write}(). That will enforce memory checking. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Thanks, > Q > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel