Nguyen Anh Quynh wrote:
> On 4/14/08, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> In practice, this check isn't actually necessary since a guest always has
>> at least 1MB of memory.
>>
>
> Agreed. But it needs to be fixed, anyway. Or we can remove it.
>
I should mention, the reason for removing the check, is that what we
really want to do is remove all references to phys_ram_base() and
replace them with cpu_physical_memory_{read,write}(). That will enforce
memory checking.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Thanks,
> Q
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
