Anthony Liguori wrote: > Right now, not specifying the -aio option is equivalent to your proposed > -aio auto. > > I guess I should include an info aio to let the user know what type of > aio they are using. We can add selection criteria later but > semantically, not specifying an explicit -aio option allows QEMU to > choose whichever one it thinks is best. > > For the majority of deployments posix aio should be sufficient. The few that need something else can use Linux aio.
Of course, a managed environment can use Linux aio unconditionally if knows the kernel has all the needed goodies. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
