On Wed, 7 May 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, authorship has been destroyed by at least two of the
> > patches (ie Christoph seems to be the author, but Andrea seems to have
> > dropped that fact).
>
> I can't follow this, please be more specific.
The patches were sent to lkml without *any* indication that you weren't
actually the author.
So if Andrew had merged them, they would have been merged as yours.
> > That "locking" code is also too ugly to live, at least without some
> > serious arguments for why it has to be done that way. Sorting the locks?
> > In a vmalloc'ed area? And calling this something innocuous like
> > "mm_lock()"? Hell no.
>
> That's only invoked in mmu_notifier_register, mm_lock is explicitly
> documented as heavyweight function.
Is that an excuse for UTTER AND TOTAL CRAP?
Linus
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
