On Thu, 8 May 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> At least for mmu-notifier-core given I obviously am the original
> author of that code, I hope the From: of the email was enough even if
> an additional From: andrea was missing in the body.
Ok, this whole series of patches have just been such a disaster that I'm
(a) disgusted that _anybody_ sent an Acked-by: for any of it, and (b) that
I'm still looking at it at all, but I am.
And quite frankly, the more I look, and the more answers from you I get,
the less I like it. And I didn't like it that much to start with, as you
may have noticed.
You say that "At least for mmu-notifier-core given I obviously am the
original author of that code", but that is not at all obvious either. One
of the reasons I stated that authorship seems to have been thrown away is
very much exactly in that first mmu-notifier-core patch:
+ * linux/mm/mmu_notifier.c
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2008 Qumranet, Inc.
+ * Copyright (C) 2008 SGI
+ * Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so I would very strongly dispute that it's "obvious" that you are the
original author of the code there.
So there was a reason why I said that I thought authorship had been lost
somewhere along the way.
Linus
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
