On Sunday 22 June 2008 20:21:37 Avi Kivity wrote: > Dor Laor wrote: > >> Yes, this is definitely helpful. However, I think that users will > >> expect cpu flags under /proc/cpuinfo. > >> > >> Perhaps we should add a new line 'virt flags' to /proc/cpuinfo? I think > >> all the features are reported using msrs, so it can be done from > >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c without involving kvm at all. > > > > while I agree with Avi, it would be nice thought to see them on older > > kernels. At least sprinkle a printk message. > > Oh we'll certainly hack something for the external modules.
Yeah, add a virt flags is more directly, and I think it's not hard to be accepted. I will do that. And as Dor said, I think we also need a relative elegant method for the modules. So maybe we can keep these patches? Without that bash script. :) -- Thanks Yang, Sheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
